Creates comprehensive decision matrices with weighted criteria, sensitivity analysis, and stakeholder impact assessment.
You are a decision analyst who helps people make complex decisions systematically. Create a decision matrix for this choice. Decision to make: [WHAT YOU'RE DECIDING] Options: [LIST OF OPTIONS] Stakeholders: [WHO'S AFFECTED] Timeline: [DECISION DEADLINE] Constraints: [NON-NEGOTIABLES] Provide: **Decision Overview** - Decision statement: [Clear articulation of decision] - Decision type: [REVERSIBLE / IRREVERSIBLE] - Stakes: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW] - Complexity: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW] **Options Identified** | Option | Brief Description | Initial Reaction | |--------|-------------------|------------------| | A | | | | B | | | | C | | | | D (Status quo) | | | **Criteria Development** | Criterion | Weight | Why Important | Measurement | |-----------|--------|---------------|-------------| | Criterion 1 | 25% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 2 | 20% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 3 | 20% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 4 | 15% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 5 | 10% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 6 | 10% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | **Decision Matrix** | Criterion (Weight) | Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | |--------------------|----------|----------|----------|----------| | C1 (25%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C2 (20%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C3 (20%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C4 (15%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C5 (10%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C6 (10%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | **Total** | **X** | **X** | **X** | **X** | Scores: 1-5 (1=Poor, 5=Excellent) Weighted Score = Score × Weight **Sensitivity Analysis** - If we increase weight of [criterion]... - Winner changes if [condition]... **Pros and Cons Summary** **Option A:** | Pros | Cons | |------|------| | | | [Repeat for each option] **Risk Comparison** | Risk | Option A | Option B | Option C | |------|----------|----------|----------| | Risk 1 | H/M/L | H/M/L | H/M/L | **Stakeholder Impact** | Stakeholder | Option A | Option B | Option C | |-------------|----------|----------|----------| | Stakeholder 1 | +/0/- | +/0/- | +/0/- | **Recommendation** - Recommended option: [X] - Score advantage: [margin] - Confidence level: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW] - Key reasons: 1. [Reason] 2. [Reason] - Caveats: **Implementation Considerations** - First steps if choosing [recommendation] - Timeline - Resources needed - Success metrics **Decision Review Plan** - Review decision in [timeframe] - Success criteria - Reversal triggers
You are a decision analyst who helps people make complex decisions systematically. Create a decision matrix for this choice. Decision to make: [WHAT YOU'RE DECIDING] Options: [LIST OF OPTIONS] Stakeholders: [WHO'S AFFECTED] Timeline: [DECISION DEADLINE] Constraints: [NON-NEGOTIABLES] Provide: **Decision Overview** - Decision statement: [Clear articulation of decision] - Decision type: [REVERSIBLE / IRREVERSIBLE] - Stakes: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW] - Complexity: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW] **Options Identified** | Option | Brief Description | Initial Reaction | |--------|-------------------|------------------| | A | | | | B | | | | C | | | | D (Status quo) | | | **Criteria Development** | Criterion | Weight | Why Important | Measurement | |-----------|--------|---------------|-------------| | Criterion 1 | 25% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 2 | 20% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 3 | 20% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 4 | 15% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 5 | 10% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | | Criterion 6 | 10% | [Rationale] | [How to score] | **Decision Matrix** | Criterion (Weight) | Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | |--------------------|----------|----------|----------|----------| | C1 (25%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C2 (20%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C3 (20%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C4 (15%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C5 (10%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | C6 (10%) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | X (Y) | | **Total** | **X** | **X** | **X** | **X** | Scores: 1-5 (1=Poor, 5=Excellent) Weighted Score = Score × Weight **Sensitivity Analysis** - If we increase weight of [criterion]... - Winner changes if [condition]... **Pros and Cons Summary** **Option A:** | Pros | Cons | |------|------| | | | [Repeat for each option] **Risk Comparison** | Risk | Option A | Option B | Option C | |------|----------|----------|----------| | Risk 1 | H/M/L | H/M/L | H/M/L | **Stakeholder Impact** | Stakeholder | Option A | Option B | Option C | |-------------|----------|----------|----------| | Stakeholder 1 | +/0/- | +/0/- | +/0/- | **Recommendation** - Recommended option: [X] - Score advantage: [margin] - Confidence level: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW] - Key reasons: 1. [Reason] 2. [Reason] - Caveats: **Implementation Considerations** - First steps if choosing [recommendation] - Timeline - Resources needed - Success metrics **Decision Review Plan** - Review decision in [timeframe] - Success criteria - Reversal triggers
This prompt is released under CC0 (Public Domain). You are free to use it for any purpose without attribution.
Explore similar prompts based on category and tags
Analyzes industry trends using PESTLE framework with forecasts, scenarios, and strategic recommendations.
Summarizes academic research papers with methodology analysis, key findings extraction, and critical assessment.
Evaluates and compares technology options with weighted scoring, TCO analysis, and recommendations.
Conducts comprehensive stakeholder analysis with power/interest mapping, engagement strategies, and communication plans.
Critically evaluate causal claims from correlational data