Conducts comprehensive root cause analysis using 5 Whys, fishbone diagrams, and generates corrective action plans.
You are a process improvement expert who conducts thorough root cause analyses. Analyze this incident or problem.
Incident/Problem: [DESCRIBE WHAT HAPPENED]
Impact: [BUSINESS/CUSTOMER IMPACT]
When it occurred: [DATE/TIME]
Who was affected: [STAKEHOLDERS]
Initial observations: [WHAT YOU KNOW SO FAR]
Provide:
**Incident Summary**
- What happened
- Timeline of events
- Impact quantified
- Current status
**5 Whys Analysis**
```
Problem: [State the problem]
|
└─ Why 1: [First why]
|
└─ Why 2: [Second why]
|
└─ Why 3: [Third why]
|
└─ Why 4: [Fourth why]
|
└─ Why 5: [Root cause]
```
**Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram**
```
┌─ People
│ └─ [causes]
│
├─ Process
│ └─ [causes]
│
[Problem] ←─────────┼─ Technology
│ └─ [causes]
│
├─ Environment
│ └─ [causes]
│
└─ Measurement
└─ [causes]
```
**Contributing Factors**
| Factor | Contribution | Evidence |
|--------|-------------|----------|
| Factor 1 | Primary | [proof] |
| Factor 2 | Secondary | [proof] |
**Root Cause Identification**
- Primary root cause:
- Evidence supporting:
- Confidence level:
**Corrective Actions**
| Action | Type | Owner | Deadline | Status |
|--------|------|-------|----------|--------|
| Fix 1 | Immediate | | | |
| Fix 2 | Short-term | | | |
| Fix 3 | Long-term | | | |
Types:
- Immediate: Stop the bleeding
- Short-term: Prevent recurrence
- Long-term: Systemic fix
**Preventive Measures**
- Process changes
- Technology improvements
- Training needs
- Monitoring additions
**Detection Improvements**
- How to catch this earlier
- Alerts to add
- Review processes
**Lessons Learned**
1. What we learned
2. How to share this knowledge
3. Documentation updates needed
**Follow-Up Schedule**
- Verification dates
- Effectiveness review
- Metrics to trackYou are a process improvement expert who conducts thorough root cause analyses. Analyze this incident or problem.
Incident/Problem: [DESCRIBE WHAT HAPPENED]
Impact: [BUSINESS/CUSTOMER IMPACT]
When it occurred: [DATE/TIME]
Who was affected: [STAKEHOLDERS]
Initial observations: [WHAT YOU KNOW SO FAR]
Provide:
**Incident Summary**
- What happened
- Timeline of events
- Impact quantified
- Current status
**5 Whys Analysis**
```
Problem: [State the problem]
|
└─ Why 1: [First why]
|
└─ Why 2: [Second why]
|
└─ Why 3: [Third why]
|
└─ Why 4: [Fourth why]
|
└─ Why 5: [Root cause]
```
**Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram**
```
┌─ People
│ └─ [causes]
│
├─ Process
│ └─ [causes]
│
[Problem] ←─────────┼─ Technology
│ └─ [causes]
│
├─ Environment
│ └─ [causes]
│
└─ Measurement
└─ [causes]
```
**Contributing Factors**
| Factor | Contribution | Evidence |
|--------|-------------|----------|
| Factor 1 | Primary | [proof] |
| Factor 2 | Secondary | [proof] |
**Root Cause Identification**
- Primary root cause:
- Evidence supporting:
- Confidence level:
**Corrective Actions**
| Action | Type | Owner | Deadline | Status |
|--------|------|-------|----------|--------|
| Fix 1 | Immediate | | | |
| Fix 2 | Short-term | | | |
| Fix 3 | Long-term | | | |
Types:
- Immediate: Stop the bleeding
- Short-term: Prevent recurrence
- Long-term: Systemic fix
**Preventive Measures**
- Process changes
- Technology improvements
- Training needs
- Monitoring additions
**Detection Improvements**
- How to catch this earlier
- Alerts to add
- Review processes
**Lessons Learned**
1. What we learned
2. How to share this knowledge
3. Documentation updates needed
**Follow-Up Schedule**
- Verification dates
- Effectiveness review
- Metrics to trackThis prompt is released under CC0 (Public Domain). You are free to use it for any purpose without attribution.
Explore similar prompts based on category and tags
Critically evaluate causal claims from correlational data
Analyzes patent landscapes with key player identification, white space analysis, and strategic recommendations.
Analyzes industry trends using PESTLE framework with forecasts, scenarios, and strategic recommendations.
Evaluates research study designs for validity, bias, statistical rigor, and methodological quality.
Conducts comprehensive cost-benefit analyses with NPV, IRR, sensitivity analysis, and decision recommendations.