Synthesizes user research into insights, personas, journey maps, and prioritized recommendations.
You are a UX researcher who synthesizes user research into actionable insights. Analyze this user research data.
[PASTE INTERVIEW NOTES, SURVEY RESPONSES, OR RESEARCH FINDINGS]
Context:
- Research methods used: [INTERVIEWS / SURVEYS / USABILITY / OBSERVATION]
- Number of participants: [N]
- Research questions: [WHAT WE WANTED TO LEARN]
- Product/feature focus: [WHAT WE'RE BUILDING]
Provide:
**Research Overview**
- Methodology summary
- Participant demographics
- Data collection period
- Confidence in findings
**Key Insights**
| Insight | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
|---------|----------|------------|--------|
| Insight 1 | X/Y participants | High | High |
For each insight:
- What we learned
- Supporting quotes
- Design implications
**User Personas**
**Persona 1: [Name]**
```
Photo placeholder: [Description]
Demographics:
- Age:
- Role:
- Tech savviness:
Goals:
- Primary goal
- Secondary goal
Frustrations:
- Pain point 1
- Pain point 2
Behaviors:
- How they currently solve this
- Tools they use
- Frequency of need
Quote: "[Representative quote]"
```
[Create 2-4 personas]
**User Journey Map**
```
Stage: Awareness → Consideration → Decision → Use → Advocacy
Actions: [what they do]
Thoughts: [what they think]
Emotions: 😟 → 😐 → 😊 [emotional journey]
Pain points:[where friction exists]
Opportunities:[where we can help]
```
**Jobs to Be Done**
- When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]
- [2-3 JTBD statements]
**Usability Issues** (if applicable)
| Issue | Severity | Frequency | Recommendation |
|-------|----------|-----------|----------------|
**Feature Prioritization Matrix**
```
High Value
^
| [Feature positions]
Low <----+----> High Effort
```
**Recommendations**
- Must do (high confidence, high impact)
- Should do (medium confidence or impact)
- Could explore (lower confidence, potential upside)
**Outstanding Questions**
- What we still need to learn
- Suggested follow-up researchYou are a UX researcher who synthesizes user research into actionable insights. Analyze this user research data.
[PASTE INTERVIEW NOTES, SURVEY RESPONSES, OR RESEARCH FINDINGS]
Context:
- Research methods used: [INTERVIEWS / SURVEYS / USABILITY / OBSERVATION]
- Number of participants: [N]
- Research questions: [WHAT WE WANTED TO LEARN]
- Product/feature focus: [WHAT WE'RE BUILDING]
Provide:
**Research Overview**
- Methodology summary
- Participant demographics
- Data collection period
- Confidence in findings
**Key Insights**
| Insight | Evidence | Confidence | Impact |
|---------|----------|------------|--------|
| Insight 1 | X/Y participants | High | High |
For each insight:
- What we learned
- Supporting quotes
- Design implications
**User Personas**
**Persona 1: [Name]**
```
Photo placeholder: [Description]
Demographics:
- Age:
- Role:
- Tech savviness:
Goals:
- Primary goal
- Secondary goal
Frustrations:
- Pain point 1
- Pain point 2
Behaviors:
- How they currently solve this
- Tools they use
- Frequency of need
Quote: "[Representative quote]"
```
[Create 2-4 personas]
**User Journey Map**
```
Stage: Awareness → Consideration → Decision → Use → Advocacy
Actions: [what they do]
Thoughts: [what they think]
Emotions: 😟 → 😐 → 😊 [emotional journey]
Pain points:[where friction exists]
Opportunities:[where we can help]
```
**Jobs to Be Done**
- When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]
- [2-3 JTBD statements]
**Usability Issues** (if applicable)
| Issue | Severity | Frequency | Recommendation |
|-------|----------|-----------|----------------|
**Feature Prioritization Matrix**
```
High Value
^
| [Feature positions]
Low <----+----> High Effort
```
**Recommendations**
- Must do (high confidence, high impact)
- Should do (medium confidence or impact)
- Could explore (lower confidence, potential upside)
**Outstanding Questions**
- What we still need to learn
- Suggested follow-up researchThis prompt is released under CC0 (Public Domain). You are free to use it for any purpose without attribution.
Explore similar prompts based on category and tags
Critically evaluate causal claims from correlational data
Analyzes patent landscapes with key player identification, white space analysis, and strategic recommendations.
Analyzes industry trends using PESTLE framework with forecasts, scenarios, and strategic recommendations.
Evaluates research study designs for validity, bias, statistical rigor, and methodological quality.
Conducts comprehensive cost-benefit analyses with NPV, IRR, sensitivity analysis, and decision recommendations.