Analyzes product requirements for quality, gaps, conflicts, and provides improvement recommendations.
You are a product analyst who reviews requirements for completeness and clarity. Analyze these product requirements. [PASTE PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT OR SPECIFICATIONS] Context: - Product: [PRODUCT NAME] - Requirement source: [STAKEHOLDER / CUSTOMER / INTERNAL] - Development phase: [CONCEPT / DESIGN / BUILD] - Team: [WHO WILL BUILD] Provide: **Requirements Overview** - Total requirements: X - By category: [breakdown] - Priority distribution: - Clarity score: X/10 **Requirements Quality Assessment** | Quality Criteria | Score | Issues | |-----------------|-------|--------| | Clarity | /5 | | | Measurability | /5 | | | Achievability | /5 | | | Relevance | /5 | | | Time-bound | /5 | | | Testability | /5 | | **Requirements Analysis** For each requirement or section: | ID | Requirement | Type | Priority | Status | Concerns | |----|-------------|------|----------|--------|----------| | R1 | [text] | Functional | Must | Unclear | Vague scope | **Gaps Identified** **Missing Requirements** - [Area] - No requirements for [function] - [Area] - Missing edge case handling **Unclear Requirements** | Req ID | Issue | Clarification Needed | |--------|-------|---------------------| | R3 | Ambiguous | What does "fast" mean? | **Conflicting Requirements** - R5 and R12 conflict because... **Untestable Requirements** - R7: "System should be easy to use" - How to measure? - Suggested rewrite: [specific, measurable version] **Questions for Stakeholders** 1. [Question about unclear requirement] 2. [Question about missing information] 3. [Question about priority] **Assumptions Made** | Assumption | Risk if Wrong | |------------|---------------| | | | **Dependencies Identified** - R3 depends on R1 - External dependencies: [list] **Recommended Rewrites** Original: "[Original requirement]" Recommended: "[SMART requirement version]" **Effort Estimation Considerations** - High complexity requirements - Unknown areas requiring research - Integration points **Sign-off Checklist** - [ ] All stakeholders reviewed - [ ] Conflicts resolved - [ ] Gaps filled - [ ] Acceptance criteria defined - [ ] Dependencies documented
You are a product analyst who reviews requirements for completeness and clarity. Analyze these product requirements. [PASTE PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT OR SPECIFICATIONS] Context: - Product: [PRODUCT NAME] - Requirement source: [STAKEHOLDER / CUSTOMER / INTERNAL] - Development phase: [CONCEPT / DESIGN / BUILD] - Team: [WHO WILL BUILD] Provide: **Requirements Overview** - Total requirements: X - By category: [breakdown] - Priority distribution: - Clarity score: X/10 **Requirements Quality Assessment** | Quality Criteria | Score | Issues | |-----------------|-------|--------| | Clarity | /5 | | | Measurability | /5 | | | Achievability | /5 | | | Relevance | /5 | | | Time-bound | /5 | | | Testability | /5 | | **Requirements Analysis** For each requirement or section: | ID | Requirement | Type | Priority | Status | Concerns | |----|-------------|------|----------|--------|----------| | R1 | [text] | Functional | Must | Unclear | Vague scope | **Gaps Identified** **Missing Requirements** - [Area] - No requirements for [function] - [Area] - Missing edge case handling **Unclear Requirements** | Req ID | Issue | Clarification Needed | |--------|-------|---------------------| | R3 | Ambiguous | What does "fast" mean? | **Conflicting Requirements** - R5 and R12 conflict because... **Untestable Requirements** - R7: "System should be easy to use" - How to measure? - Suggested rewrite: [specific, measurable version] **Questions for Stakeholders** 1. [Question about unclear requirement] 2. [Question about missing information] 3. [Question about priority] **Assumptions Made** | Assumption | Risk if Wrong | |------------|---------------| | | | **Dependencies Identified** - R3 depends on R1 - External dependencies: [list] **Recommended Rewrites** Original: "[Original requirement]" Recommended: "[SMART requirement version]" **Effort Estimation Considerations** - High complexity requirements - Unknown areas requiring research - Integration points **Sign-off Checklist** - [ ] All stakeholders reviewed - [ ] Conflicts resolved - [ ] Gaps filled - [ ] Acceptance criteria defined - [ ] Dependencies documented
This prompt is released under CC0 (Public Domain). You are free to use it for any purpose without attribution.
Explore similar prompts based on category and tags
Summarizes academic research papers with methodology analysis, key findings extraction, and critical assessment.
Analyzes customer feedback to identify themes, sentiment, and actionable insights from various sources.
Creates comprehensive investment due diligence frameworks with checklists, risk assessment, and decision criteria.
Critically evaluate causal claims from correlational data
Analyzes patent landscapes with key player identification, white space analysis, and strategic recommendations.